Sunday, November 15, 2009


Federal Bureau of Investigation

F.B.I. Headquarters
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

U.S. Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
Criminal Section

Thomas E. Perez

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest
Washington, DC 20530

ROGUE U.S. JUDGE RICHARD A. LAZZARA

LEE COUNTY BRIBERY & LAND FRAUD SCANDAL

DEFENDANT ROGUE JUDGE RICHARD A. LAZZARA RAPED THE LAW

1. Those sworn to protect and serve our country must themselves uphold the law and the U.S. Constitution. The Federal Bureau of Investigation investigates “color of law” abuses by public officials, including judicial crimes.

2. U.S. judges such as here crooked Lazzara have been given tremendous power by Federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. However, these powers do not include, e.g., case fixing, obstruction of justice, fraud, and making corrupted rulings in exchange for bribes.

3. Preventing abuse of governmental authority is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a Federal crime for anyone acting under “color of lawwillfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law.

4. The F.B.I. is the lead Federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority.

FOR BRIBES, DEFENDANT ROGUE JUDGE LAZZARA FIXED CASES

5. Just like sentenced Judge Bobby DeLaughter, rogue U.S. District Judge Richard A. Lazzara obstructed justice. Here, the public wishes to see rogue and corrupt U.S. Judge Lazzara in leg irons and handcuffs just like convicted Judge Bobby DeLaughter, because Lazzara accepted Defendants’ bribes in exchange for fixing Plaintiffs’ Cases and extending “Lee County” fraud schemes & forgeries such as, e.g.:

a. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;

b. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 07-44-20-01-00001.0000”;

c. Forged “land claim” O.R. 569/875”;

d. Forged “park”.

FOR BRIBES, LAZZARA EXTENDED “LEE COUNTY” FRAUD SCHEMES

6. In exchange for bribes, Defendant corrupt Judge Lazzara unduly favored the Defendants, fixed Plaintiffs’ Cases, and extended Defendants’ fraud and extortion schemes for the unlawful purpose of deliberately depriving and defrauding the Plaintiffs and the owners of the more than 1,200 platted land parcels in the private undedicated residential Cayo Costa Subdivision, Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25.

TAINTED LEE COUNTY OFFICIAL JACK N. PETERSON

7. Said bribery scandal tainted Lee County’s Officials and Lawyers and injured the Plaintiff unimpeachable record owners. Here, Lee County’s Assistant Attorney Jack N. Peterson influenced, e.g., Defendant recused U.S. District Judge John Edwin Steele, Defendant recused U.S. Magistrate Polster Chappell, and Defendant rogue Judge Richard A. Lazzara, who conspired to concoctfrivolity” of Plaintiffs’ allegations and conclusive evidence of the prima facie illegality and criminality of “Lee County” fraud and forgery schemes:

a. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;

b. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 07-44-20-01-00001.0000”;

c. Forged “land claim” O.R. 569/875”;

d. Forged “park”.

LAZZARA THREATENED THE PLAINTIFFS TO EVADE HIS PROSECUTION

8. Rather than intelligently answer to the allegations and conclusive evidence of, e.g., judicial corruption, fraud, fraud on the court, Defendant objectively partial and corrupt Judge Richard A. Lazzara again fixed Plaintiffs’ civil rights Case, # 2:09-cv-602-FtM-JES-SPC [BOTH RECUSED] in exchange for Defendants’ bribes. Named party Defendant Lazzara refused to recuse himself, threatened, and criminally coerced the Plaintiffs to evade his own prosecution.

DEFENDANT ROGUE U.S. JUDGE LAZZARA’S FACIAL FRAUD SCHEMES

9. No intelligent and impartial judge, juror, or person could have possibly determined that a fake “resolution” [Lee County facial scam “O.R. 569/875”] created or transferred any property interest or estate to Lee County, Florida. Only a court of law and/or court judgment could have possibly involuntarily divested the Plaintiffs of their Constitutionally protected property, Lee County riparian Gulf-front Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A. Here, Lazzara fraudulently and unintelligently pretended that “Lee County” had a property interest in Plaintiffs’ platted street land and street easement “by virtue of” prima facie “Lee County” fraud & extortion scheme “O.R. 569/875”. Rogue U.S. Judge Lazzara knew, concealed, and conspired to conceal that Lee County, Florida, never held and could have never possibly held title to Plaintiffs’ riparian Gulf-front Lot “015A”. For the illegal purpose of evading his own prosecution and obstructing justice, Defendant rogue U.S. Judge Lazzara concocted “frivolity” and fixed Plaintiffs’ Cases in exchange for Defendants’ bribes.

“INVESTIGATING PUBLIC CORRUPTION

Public corruption is one of the F.B.I.'s top investigative priorities—behind only terrorism, espionage, and cyber crimes. Why? Because of its impact on our democracy and national security. Public corruption can affect everything from how well our borders are secured and our neighborhoods protected…to verdicts handed down in courts… And it takes a significant toll on our pocketbooks, too, siphoning off tax dollars.”

DEFENDANT ROGUE JUDGE LAZZARA FABRICATED A “RESOLUTION

10. In exchange for Defendants’ bribes, Defendant rogue Federal Judge R. A. Lazzara fabricated evidence such as, e.g., a fake “resolution” and/or “legislative act” thereby violating the color of law statute, and taking away Plaintiffs’ rights of due process, equal protection of the laws, and unreasonable seizure. Defendant corrupt Judge Lazzara knew, concealed, and conspired to conceal that noresolution” and/or law could have possibly created or transferred any “Lee County” interest or estate to Lee County, Florida.

11. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees Plaintiffs’ right against unreasonable seizures of Plaintiffs’ real and personal property.

12. In exchange for bribes, Defendant corrupt Judge Lazzara conspired with other Defendants to unlawfully obtain and/or maintain Plaintiffs’ personal property and riparian Lee County Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A “on the Gulf of Mexico”. In these Cases of fraud and deliberate deprivations of Plaintiffs’ Constitutionally protected property, Defendant rogue Judge Lazzara violated the color of law statute and conspired with other Defendants to defraud and deliberately deprive the Plaintiff unimpeachable record owners of riparian Parcel 12-44-20-01-00015.015A “on the Gulf of Mexico”. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; see 12/29/2000 LEE COUNTY MEMORANDUM; see JOHN LAY AND JANET LAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, OGC CASE NOs. 01-0203, 01-0204, DOAH CASE NOs. 01-1541, 01-1542, CASE NOs. DEP01-0860, DEP01-0876. See West Peninsular Title Co. v. Palm Beach County, 41 F.3d 1490, 1492 n.4 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 932, 116 S. Ct. 338, 133 L. Ed. 2d 237 (1995).

DEFENDANT ROGUE JUDGE LAZZARA FIXED PLAINTIFFS’ CASES

13. Here, Lazzara had no official authority, whatsoever, to fix Plaintiffs’ Cases under fraudulent and false pretenses of “frivolity” of Plaintiffs’ allegations and conclusive evidence of the facial illegality and criminality of said facial “Lee County” fraud schemes and forgeries:

a. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;

b. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 07-44-20-01-00001.0000”;

c. Forged “land claim” O.R. 569/875”;

d. Forged “park”.

PATTERN & PRACTICE INVESTIGATION OF LEE COUNTY SHERIFF

14. Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or U.S. laws. This law, commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute, gives the Department of Justice authority to seek civil remedies in cases where law enforcement agencies have policies or practices that foster a pattern of misconduct by employees. Plaintiffs’ action is directed against, e.g., the Lee County Sheriff’s Office, which concealed and conspired to conceal:

a. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;

b. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 07-44-20-01-00001.0000”;

c. Forged “land claim” O.R. 569/875”;

d. Forged “park”.

15. Said Sheriff’s citizen complaint processes treated the Plaintiff Complainants as adversaries, which warranted the “pattern and practice” investigation. When the Plaintiffs complained about said “Lee County” fraud and extortion schemes and Defendants’ trespass and destruction of Plaintiffs’ property, the Lee County Sheriffs’ Office seized and confiscated Plaintiffs’ property on their riparian Gulf-front Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A to coerce the Plaintiffs to refrain from litigation. Here, the Lee County Sheriff’s Office violated Plaintiffs’ right to due process and equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Said Sheriff’s Office knew, concealed, and conspired to conceal Defendants’ arson and open fires within the private undedicated residential Cayo Costa Subdivision, Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25. Said Sheriff’s Office corrupted the peace and conspired to corrupt the peace for the unlawful purpose of concealing:

a. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;

b. Forged “Lee County” “parcel 07-44-20-01-00001.0000”;

c. Forged “land claim” O.R. 569/875”;

d. Forged “park”.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________

/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

Crime Victim and Plaintiff, pro se

P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295

______________________________________

/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.

State Certified Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor

Crime Victim and Plaintiff, pro se

JRBU@aol.com; T: 239-595-7074

1 comment:

  1. LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, REAL ESTATE FRAUD SCHEMES

    The original Owner and Developer, A. C. Roesch, had platted and subdivided the lot(s) and riparian upland lot in the private undedicated residential Cayo Costa Subdivision as 50’ x 130’. See riparian accreted Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A “on the Gulf of Mexico”; Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25. Therefore here, the Defendants had fraudulently and falsely pretended “frivolity” of Plaintiffs’ allegations of fraudulent, false, and illegal “Lee County” ownership “claims”. Here, the Defendants knew, concealed, and conspired to conceal that Lee County never had and/or held any title to Plaintiff(s) said riparian Gulf-front Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A and that the public record had conclusively established “Lee County’s” forgeries and land “title” fraud schemes. See facially forged “Lee County” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” and forged “claim” “O.R. 569/875”, which never legally existed.

    ReplyDelete